Vania Phitidis
Written by Vania Phitidis
Peaceful Eating Coach
Last updated on 30 March 2026
Reading time: 9 minutes

Most of the women I work with already know.

They know that dieting doesn’t work long term. They know the research. They’ve lived the cycle enough times to be able to map it out: the restriction, the hunger, the cravings, the eventual loss of control, the shame, the starting over. They could draw it on a napkin. They have drawn it on a napkin.

And yet. Monday comes around and there’s a new plan. A cleaner approach this time. Cutting out sugar, or processed food, or eating only within a certain window. Not a diet, exactly – just being more mindful. Just trying to be a bit healthier.

If you recognise yourself in this, I want to say something clearly before we go any further: this is not a failure of intelligence or self-awareness. The gap between knowing something and actually changing it is one of the most human experiences there is. And understanding why that gap exists is the first step to doing something about it.

Why knowing isn’t enough

We tend to assume that if we understand something intellectually, behaviour change should follow. That insight leads to action. But the part of you that reaches for a new set of food rules when life feels chaotic isn’t operating from your intellect. It’s operating from something older and more urgent than that.

Restriction offers things that feel genuinely valuable in the moment: structure when everything else feels out of control. A sense of doing something. A project to focus on. The feeling, at least temporarily, of being on top of it. These are real psychological needs – and dieting, whatever its failures, has learned to meet them very efficiently.

The alternative – actually stopping, letting go of the rules, learning to trust your body without a plan – doesn’t offer any of that, at least not at first. It asks you to sit in uncertainty. To tolerate hunger signals you’ve spent years overriding. To eat something without calculating what it costs you. For many women, that feels not like freedom but like freefall.

Knowing the cage is a cage doesn’t automatically make you feel safe outside it.

This is why information alone – books, podcasts, even therapy – often isn’t enough to shift the pattern. The work has to happen at a different level entirely. Not in the part of you that understands, but in the part of you that feels.

The fear underneath it all – and the system that feeds it

There is something deeper driving all of this than habit or psychology alone. Underneath the food rules, for many women, is a very real and very understandable fear: of illness, of decline, of losing control of their health as they age. The desire to feel well, to stay mobile, to be there for the people they love. These are not irrational fears. They are deeply human ones.

And into that fear steps an entire industry, ready with an answer. Eat this way and you will be well. Cut this out and you will be safe. Follow these rules and you will be in control. The message is everywhere – and it arrives with enormous confidence, often from voices that carry real authority: wellness influencers with huge platforms, MDs speaking outside their specialism, practitioners from disciplines like chiropractic, osteopathy or kinesiology recommending specific dietary approaches with little formal training in nutrition science. The landscape is loud, contradictory, and genuinely difficult to navigate.

What unites almost all of it, though, is a particular idea – one that sits at the heart of what I’d call the neoliberal health narrative: that your health is your personal responsibility. That your body is a project you are in charge of. That if you make the right choices, you can control the outcome. And that if your health suffers, somewhere along the line you didn’t try hard enough.

It is a seductive idea, because it offers a feeling of agency. But it is also, the evidence tells us, largely a fiction. The social determinants of health – poverty, housing quality, job security, air quality, access to healthcare, chronic stress – predict health outcomes and life expectancy far more powerfully than individual food choices. Poverty, in particular, is one of the strongest predictors of early death and ill health that we have. Not what someone ate for breakfast.

None of this means food doesn’t matter or that how we eat has no bearing on how we feel. It does. But it means the story we’ve been sold – that our health is primarily a function of our personal discipline around eating – is a significant distortion. And it is a distortion that keeps women locked in a cycle of self-blame and rule-following that serves the wellness industry far more than it serves them.

But I’m not dieting – I’m just eating healthily

Here’s where it gets more complicated. Because many women who come to me genuinely don’t identify as dieters. They’re not following a plan or counting anything. They’re just trying to eat well. More vegetables, less processed food, cutting back on sugar, not eating after eight. Reasonable things. Healthy things, even.

And there’s nothing inherently wrong with any of that. Wanting to nourish your body well is not a problem. But there’s a question worth sitting with: what is the relationship underneath the behaviour?

Is eating a particular way coming from a place of genuine care for your body – from curiosity about how food makes you feel, from pleasure, from wanting energy and vitality? Or is it coming from a place of control, fear, or the belief that your body needs to be managed and kept in line?

Because the same plate of food can mean completely different things depending on what’s driving the choice. And a restrictive mindset doesn’t need a formal diet to operate in. It can live very comfortably inside ‘clean eating’, or ‘just cutting back’, or ‘being sensible.’ The rules are less visible, but the relationship is the same: food as something to be controlled, the body as something that cannot be trusted, worth as something contingent on eating the right things.

It’s not about what you’re eating. It’s about what eating means to you.

The signs worth noticing

So how do you tell the difference between genuinely nourishing yourself and operating from a restrictive mindset in different clothing? There’s no perfect checklist, but here are some of the patterns I notice most often:

Food has a strong moral charge – certain things are clean or dirty, good or bad, and eating the wrong ones comes with guilt or the need to compensate. You find yourself mentally negotiating throughout the day – balancing what you’ve had against what you’re allowed, or earning food through movement. Eating spontaneously or outside your usual choices feels genuinely anxiety-provoking. You can eat the ‘right’ things and still feel like you’re failing – because the bar keeps shifting. Or you swing between periods of very controlled eating and periods of feeling completely out of control – which feels like proof that you need more rules, when actually it’s often the rules themselves creating the swing.

None of this makes you broken. It makes you someone who has been living inside a set of beliefs about food and bodies that were handed to you by a culture with a vested interest in keeping you there.

What actually stopping looks like

I want to be honest: actually stopping – really stopping, not just swapping one set of rules for another – is uncomfortable before it becomes liberating. I think it’s important to say that rather than make it sound like a straightforward path to food freedom.

I call this phase the messy middle. And messy is the right word. When you first lift the restrictions, the body doesn’t immediately settle into calm, attuned eating. Often it does the opposite. There can be a period of eating outside of what feels like attunement – reaching for things you’d previously forbidden, eating past the point of comfortable fullness, feeling like the wheels have come off entirely.

This is not a sign that something has gone wrong. It is the body testing you. Checking whether you really mean it this time. Whether the rules are genuinely gone or whether this is just another cycle that will tighten back up again. After years of restriction and deprivation, that testing is completely understandable – and it has to be allowed to happen.

The fear that comes with it is real and I never minimise it. If I stop restricting, will I just keep gaining weight? Will it ever stop? I hear this from almost every woman I work with in this phase. And what I offer them is this image: think of a pendulum that has been held forcibly to one side for years. The moment you release it, it swings hard in the other direction. That swing can feel alarming. But if you stop interfering with it – if you resist the urge to grab it and pull it back – it will gradually slow. It will find its own resting point, in the middle. The body, given genuine permission and enough time, does the same.

What makes it possible to stay with that discomfort rather than reaching for a new set of rules is support. Doing this work in relationship with someone who understands both the pull of the old patterns and what it takes to sit with the uncertainty of releasing them. Someone who can help you examine where the beliefs came from in the first place – and decide, consciously, whether you want to keep carrying them.

The women I work with who have come through the messy middle describe what’s on the other side in similar ways. Not a dramatic moment of revelation, but a gradual quietening. The noise around food gets softer. The rules loosen their grip. Eating becomes, over time, less of a battleground and more of a simple, ordinary, unremarkable part of life.

That is available to you. Not on the other side of one more attempt to get it right – but through a completely different door.

If you’re ready to find that door, I’d love to talk.

I work 1:1 with women who are ready to stop going around the same loop. You can book a free discovery call here.

With love from Vania